|
Landlords of residential tenants: Make sure you fully comply with the Tenancy Deposit Scheme rules.
A landlord was required to pay three times a deposit amount after it failed to give its tenant all the information prescribed by the tenancy deposit scheme rules. As you will know, these were introduced in April 2007 and provide that all deposits must be safeguarded by one of three Government approved schemes and landlords must also give full information about the deposit to their tenants.
In Suupere v Nice, the landlord informed the tenant about the amount held, the name of scheme holding the deposit and the reference number. But, they did not tell the tenant the circumstances in which the landlord could withdraw the deposit nor did they provide a certificate signed by the landlord confirming that the information in it was accurate.
This was in breach of the rules and the landlord was fined. This was in spite of the fact that at the time of the court hearing the landlord had returned the deposit in full to the tenant. The court considered that although the finding may appear harsh, the landlord should have put its house in order in time.
Replies to enquiries – you could be liable for misrepresentation if you don’t update your replies before exchange.
In Cleaver v Schyde Investments Ltd, a buyer wanted to develop a property for housing. The seller replied to enquiries about applications for planning permissions by saying “There are none”. The introduction to the enquiries contained a statement that the seller would inform the buyer of anything that would change its replies before exchange.
Two days later, the seller became aware of a planning application from a third party to develop the property into a medical centre, and the seller did not tell the buyer about this. After exchange, the buyer found out about this application and sought to rescind the contract.
The case went to Court of Appeal and upheld the buyer’s claim, rescinding the contract.
|